Tesugen

Kant’s Architectonics

Found the following when googling around:

Practically all books and not a few articles on [Charles Sanders] Peirce point out the fact that the American philosopher highly commended the parallel drawn by Kant between a philosophical doctrine and a piece of architecture.
- José Ferrater Mora, “Peirce’s Conception of Architectonic and Related Views,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research no. 15, March 1995.

So I searched Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason at Amazon; found the following passages:

Human reason is by nature architectonic. That is to say, it regards all our knowledge as belonging to a possible system, and therefore allows only such principles as do not at any rate make it impossible for any knowledge that we may attain to combine into a system with other knowledge. [p. 429]

And:

By an architectonic I understand the art of constructing systems. As systematic unity is what first raises ordinary knowledge to the rank of science, that is, makes a system out of a mere aggregate of knowledge, architectonic is the doctrine of the scientific in our knowledge, and therefore necessarily forms part of the doctrine of method. [p. 653]

The above was posted to my personal weblog on January 30, 2005. My name is Peter Lindberg and I am a thirtysomething software developer and dad living in Stockholm, Sweden. Here, you’ll find posts in English and Swedish about whatever happens to interest me for the moment.

Tags:

Related posts:

Posted around the same time:

The seven most recent posts:

  1. Tesugen Replaced (October 7)
  2. My Year of MacBook Troubles (May 16)
  3. Tesugen Turns Five (March 21)
  4. Gustaf Nordenskiöld om keramik kontra kläddesign (December 10, 2006)
  5. Se till att ha två buffertar för oförutsedda utgifter (October 30, 2006)
  6. Bra tips för den som vill börja fondspara (October 7, 2006)
  7. Light-Hearted Parenting Tips (September 16, 2006)
Bloggtoppen.se