Tesugen

Complexity theory and software

Six months ago, I finished reading Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, by Mitchell Waldrop, and wrote a long post about it:

[The simple rules of Boids] are enough to create something very similar to how real flocks of birds behave. So, if such a simple theory can give rise to unpredictable and complex behavior in the interactions of a population of several such agents—does this mean that a software system soon gets infinitely complex, as it evolves into consisting of several agents, each following its own specialized, and often not that simple theory?

My conclusion then was, that it kind of does, but that there are some important differences.

The above was posted to my personal weblog on September 9, 2003. My name is Peter Lindberg and I am a thirtysomething software developer and dad living in Stockholm, Sweden. Here, you’ll find posts in English and Swedish about whatever happens to interest me for the moment.

Tags:

Related posts:

Posted around the same time:

The seven most recent posts:

  1. Tesugen Replaced (October 7)
  2. My Year of MacBook Troubles (May 16)
  3. Tesugen Turns Five (March 21)
  4. Gustaf Nordenskiöld om keramik kontra kläddesign (December 10, 2006)
  5. Se till att ha två buffertar för oförutsedda utgifter (October 30, 2006)
  6. Bra tips för den som vill börja fondspara (October 7, 2006)
  7. Light-Hearted Parenting Tips (September 16, 2006)
Bloggtoppen.se