Tesugen

Slime molds

Yesterday I finally got my hands on Emergence. Oops bought a copy sometime ago and I’ve been eager to read it.

In the introduction, Steven Johnson interviews Evelyn Fox Keller, a Ph.D. in physics that participated in launching the line of thought that’s called “emergence” (I don’t know yet if it’s Johnson who coined the term or if it has been known by that name since before the book). Regarding the slime mold – which actually is an organism that, as Johnson writes, “spends much of its life as thousands of distinct single-celled units, each moving separately from its other comrades. Under the right conditions, those myriad cells will coalesce again into a single, larger organism” – Keller says that biologists had a hard time accepting the fact that there aren’t any “founder cells” or “pacemaker cells” – cells that shepherd the others.

Keller and her collaborate Lee Segel published a paper in 1969, arguing that there weren’t any such pacemaker cells – something that biologists had assumed, writes Johnson, “were a sign of insufficient data, or poorly designed experiments”. Keller says, “The response was very interesting [...] For anyone who understood applied mathematics, or had any experience in fluid dynamics, this was old hat to them. But to biologists, it didn’t make any sense. I would give seminars to biologists, and they’d say ‘So? Where’s the founder cell? Where’s the pacemaker?’ It didn’t provide any satisfaction to them whatsoever.”

Johnson continues, “Keller’s challenge [...] also unearthed a secret history of decentralized thinking, a history that had been submerged for many years beneath the weight of the pacemaker hypothesis and the traditional boundaries of scientific research.” That is, it meant the beginning of the end for the idea that there must always be some entity that controls groups of other entities. The idea that groups of things – be it birds, ants or people – can “self-organize” without the help of a coordinator is hard to accept. We fear that there must always be someone calling the shots.

This makes me think of one interesting response I got from Deric to my post The relationship organism. He said that my post linked with ideas he had about teamwork and the appearingly subtle difference between “shared responsibility” and “common responsibility”. Shared responsibility is when each member of a team has his/her share of the task; the team is done when every member is done. Common responsibility, on the other hand, is when every member does everything to get the task done – either working directly with the problem being solved, or indirectly by supporting his/her team members. The difference between these two is that with common responsibility, every member sees it as his/her responsibility to finish the task, instead of only caring for 25%.

With shared responsibility you definitely need someone calling the shots, but with common responsibility you don’t. This is something that’s rather central to XP, but I guess that many XP projects struggle because of the notion that you must have someone in charge. When I read Deric’s e-mail, I also came to think of the Engines of Democracy article I read a while back (see here), about how at General Electric’s jet engine factory, there were one boss, that was more like a coach than a boss (that is, that she regarded her primary duty to be to enable the workers to do their job as effectively as possible).

I think this flawed thinking – that you must always have someone in control of things – is something we must rid ourselves of. As a programmer, I have found it to be rather obvious that development can be done much more effectively, if only the buyer of a system engages closely in the project – and if both the buyer and producer parts are following the “common responsibility” maxim. The farther the buyer and producer parts are, the slower things go; the more time has to be spent nailing down specs and verifying the outcome (see here); the more both parts become defensive and want to secure their backs in case the project should fail.

In other words, it’s time to start behaving as slime molds, folks!

The above was posted to my personal weblog on August 30, 2002. My name is Peter Lindberg and I am a thirtysomething software developer and dad living in Stockholm, Sweden. Here, you’ll find posts in English and Swedish about whatever happens to interest me for the moment.

Posted around the same time:

The seven most recent posts:

  1. Tesugen Replaced (October 7)
  2. My Year of MacBook Troubles (May 16)
  3. Tesugen Turns Five (March 21)
  4. Gustaf Nordenskiöld om keramik kontra kläddesign (December 10, 2006)
  5. Se till att ha två buffertar för oförutsedda utgifter (October 30, 2006)
  6. Bra tips för den som vill börja fondspara (October 7, 2006)
  7. Light-Hearted Parenting Tips (September 16, 2006)
Bloggtoppen.se